ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing health care, particularly in radiology for which large retrospective electronic datasets are naturally suited to training large machine and deep learning models. To date, the vast majority of United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared AI software tools are geared toward radiology applications, with most in neuroradiology and very few in pediatric radiology. Pediatric innovations have historically lagged behind adults due to children's limited exam tolerance, small and rare datasets, age-related variability in normal and disease processes, and ethical/legal concerns for vulnerable populations. The chasm between research and clinical applications is further hampered by a smaller commercial market share in pediatrics. Nevertheless, understanding of AI successes and failures in adult neuroradiology can help inform progress in pediatric neuroradiology. Furthermore, the rise of generative AI can help overcome current limitations and enable complex multimodal pattern recognition for a broader variety of use cases. Human expert oversight will help mitigate AI risks including data and algorithmic bias, black-box errors, and regulatory gaps. In this review, we will discuss AI technical principles and pitfalls, relevant clinical tools, promising research advances, and future directions for pediatric neuroimaging. Key AI applications to be discussed include quality/safety, fetal, neonatal, hydrocephalus, malformations, tumors, epilepsy, demyelination, stroke, and trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479162What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.