Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479171›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Sex-Biased Immunity: The Hidden Variable in Immuno-oncology.

Kasidy Brown, Noah I Hornick, Megan K Ruhland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kasidy BrownCell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-7888-9538
Noah I HornickDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-7693
Megan K RuhlandCell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-8363

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Program in Biomedical SciencesT32GM142619 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Wallace Tyner · 2021 to 2026
$3.2M
Androgen receptor signaling and sex differences in anti-tumor dendritic cell functionR01CA299335 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RUHLAND, MEGAN K · 2025 to 2025
$2.3M
Concern Foundation (The Concern Foundation)Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP)Melanoma Research Foundation (MRF)National Cancer Institute (NCI) NCI 1R01CA299335National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) KL2National Institutes of Health (NIH) P30CA069533National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32GM142619NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCI NIH HHS R01 CA299335NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142619V Foundation for Cancer Research (VFCR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of an individual's immune system to mount a productive response against the tumor is critical for the success of immunotherapy. Clinical trials in multiple tumor types have revealed that the degree and manner in which any one person's immune system mobilizes to eliminate tumor cells can vary widely, contributing to immunotherapeutic efficacy. Efforts to uncover biological factors contributing to response rates are a crucial area of ongoing research, given the pressing clinical need to better stratify patients based on the likelihood of response to a given therapy. Although sex differences have long been observed in the field of immunobiology, the consideration of sex as a biological variable in the immunotherapeutic treatment of patients with cancer has yet to be addressed or incorporated into patient care. Over the past decade, in part due to the National Institutes of Health-mandated changes in how sex is handled as a biological variable, research has shifted markedly in how clinical and preclinical data are reported and interpreted. These changes have brought renewed attention to the ways sex shapes antitumor immunity and responses to immunotherapy. In this review, we examine the expanding body of research demonstrating that male and female immune responses differ in their effectiveness against tumors and explore the implications of these differences for responses to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologySex CharacteristicsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID42479171
PMCPMC13632641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.