ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Sex-Biased Immunity: The Hidden Variable in Immuno-oncology.
Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of an individual's immune system to mount a productive response against the tumor is critical for the success of immunotherapy. Clinical trials in multiple tumor types have revealed that the degree and manner in which any one person's immune system mobilizes to eliminate tumor cells can vary widely, contributing to immunotherapeutic efficacy. Efforts to uncover biological factors contributing to response rates are a crucial area of ongoing research, given the pressing clinical need to better stratify patients based on the likelihood of response to a given therapy. Although sex differences have long been observed in the field of immunobiology, the consideration of sex as a biological variable in the immunotherapeutic treatment of patients with cancer has yet to be addressed or incorporated into patient care. Over the past decade, in part due to the National Institutes of Health-mandated changes in how sex is handled as a biological variable, research has shifted markedly in how clinical and preclinical data are reported and interpreted. These changes have brought renewed attention to the ways sex shapes antitumor immunity and responses to immunotherapy. In this review, we examine the expanding body of research demonstrating that male and female immune responses differ in their effectiveness against tumors and explore the implications of these differences for responses to immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.