ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Influence of wall distensibility on local hemodynamics at the normal carotid bifurcation: a fluid-structure interaction study.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of local hemodynamics on atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation has been the subject of study by computational fluid-dynamics (CFD) simulations for over three decades. Nevertheless, questions still swirl about the inherent rigid-wall assumption, especially with the introduction of increasingly predictive-but also increasingly intricate-hemodynamic parameters. Two-way-coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations were performed on a cohort of 10 carotid bifurcations with ostensibly normal lumen geometries, along with CFD simulations assuming rigid arterial walls. In FSI simulations, carotid wall mechanical properties were assumed to be anisotropic via a fiber-reinforced hyperelastic material model, also accounting for prestress and external tissue support. Three-element Windkessel models were used to impose pressure conditions consistent with patient-specific measured inflow rates and outflow divisions. Maximum cross-sectional area changes over the cardiac cycle were generally less than 21%. Qualitatively, only small-to-moderate differences were observed between FSI and CFD simulations in terms of wall shear stress (WSS) and intravascular flow patterns. Quantitatively, median differences in the surface areas exposed to low time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), high oscillatory shear index (OSI) and topological shear variation index (TSVI) were 4.1%, 1.4%, and 2.3%, respectively, and co-localized satisfactorily (median similarity index: 0.83, 0.79, and 0.68, respectively). CFD simulations assuming arterial rigid walls are generally sufficient to adequately capture hemodynamic features of biological/clinical relevance, even for sensitive quantities like TSVI. However, the benefits of FSI for computation of structural quantities and the ability to explore the synergistic relationship between these quantities and hemodynamic stresses on the endothelium should not be overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.