Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479204›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026

Influence of wall distensibility on local hemodynamics at the normal carotid bifurcation: a fluid-structure interaction study.

Sara Zambon, Valentina Mazzi, Karol Calò, Mariachiara Arminio, Sabrina Nocerino, Claudio Chiastra, David A Steinman, Umberto Morbiducci, Diego Gallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara ZambonPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Valentina MazziPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Karol CalòPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Mariachiara ArminioPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Sabrina NocerinoPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Claudio ChiastraPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
David A SteinmanBiomedical Simulation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Umberto MorbiducciPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Diego GalloPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy. diego.gallo@polito.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-7111

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca 2022L7KK7L
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of local hemodynamics on atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation has been the subject of study by computational fluid-dynamics (CFD) simulations for over three decades. Nevertheless, questions still swirl about the inherent rigid-wall assumption, especially with the introduction of increasingly predictive-but also increasingly intricate-hemodynamic parameters. Two-way-coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations were performed on a cohort of 10 carotid bifurcations with ostensibly normal lumen geometries, along with CFD simulations assuming rigid arterial walls. In FSI simulations, carotid wall mechanical properties were assumed to be anisotropic via a fiber-reinforced hyperelastic material model, also accounting for prestress and external tissue support. Three-element Windkessel models were used to impose pressure conditions consistent with patient-specific measured inflow rates and outflow divisions. Maximum cross-sectional area changes over the cardiac cycle were generally less than 21%. Qualitatively, only small-to-moderate differences were observed between FSI and CFD simulations in terms of wall shear stress (WSS) and intravascular flow patterns. Quantitatively, median differences in the surface areas exposed to low time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), high oscillatory shear index (OSI) and topological shear variation index (TSVI) were 4.1%, 1.4%, and 2.3%, respectively, and co-localized satisfactorily (median similarity index: 0.83, 0.79, and 0.68, respectively). CFD simulations assuming arterial rigid walls are generally sufficient to adequately capture hemodynamic features of biological/clinical relevance, even for sensitive quantities like TSVI. However, the benefits of FSI for computation of structural quantities and the ability to explore the synergistic relationship between these quantities and hemodynamic stresses on the endothelium should not be overlooked.

Indexed as

Carotid ArteriesHemodynamicsHydrodynamicsComputer SimulationHumansModels, CardiovascularStress, MechanicalCarotid arteryCollagen fibersComputational fluid dynamicsHelicityPrestressWall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID42479204
PMCPMC13388534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.