ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Validation of the Italian version of the In-Person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (IP-TICS).
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study validated the Italian version of the In-Person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (IP-TICS).
methods468 healthy Italian individuals (176 males; age: 57.5 ± 15.4, education: 13.2 ± 3.7) completed the TICS, IP-TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Correlational analyses explored the construct validity of the IP-TICS against the TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analyses tested the configural, metric and scalar invariance between the TICS and IP-TICS. Statistical equivalence was assessed via a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure. Equating norms were derived via log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE) analyses, with TOST procedures assessing equivalence between empirical and LSEE-derived scores.
resultsThe IP-TICS converged with the TICS, MMSE and MoCA, showing configural and metric invariance and equivalence with the TICS. Empirical and LSEE-derived scores were statistically equivalent. DISCUSSION: Findings support the convergence, equivalence and invariance between the TICS and the IP-TICS. The IP-TICS converges with established in-person screeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.