ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
11.5-Fr Large-Bore Plastic Stents Versus Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stents for the Management of Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Obstruction in Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative Biliary Stents in Pancreatic Cancer: Compare the Entire Pathway to Resection.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are recommended for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, they are associated with a relatively high incidence of non-recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) adverse events (AEs), such as pancreatitis and cholecystitis. The 11.5-Fr large-bore plastic stent (LBPS) is a newly developed stent with a larger diameter than conventional plastic stents. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LBPS and SEMS in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 80 patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic cancer between January 2011 and December 2025. Patients were divided into the LBPS and SEMS groups according to the stent placed.
resultsRBO occurred in 20.0% and 25.0% of patients in the LBPS and SEMS groups, respectively, with no significant difference in the time to RBO between the groups. Pancreatitis and cholecystitis were observed in 0% versus 18.3%, and 0% versus 8.3% of patients in the LBPS and SEMS groups, respectively.
conclusionThe 11.5-Fr LBPS demonstrated patency comparable to that of SEMS and was associated with a low incidence of non-RBO AEs. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.