ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2026
3D HepG2 spheroid model exhibits drug-specific response profiles validating their application in therapeutic screening.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work establishes a robust and reproducible 96-well plate-based 3D HepG2 tumour spheroid model for drug screening applications. A 7-d culture protocol was optimised to generate HepG2 spheroid model using 96-well ultra-low attachment plates with 5 seeding densities (500, 1000, 2500, 5000 and 10,000 cells/well). Spheroids were evaluated for morphology, viability and proliferation. The optimized model was treated with doxorubicin and sorafenib at their respective IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479324What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.