Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479407›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology2026

Occupational benzene exposure and risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi, Mattia Bonetti, Darshi Shah, Vincent DeStefano, Veer Shah, Paolo Boffetta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monireh Sadat SeyyedsalehiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Mattia BonettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Darshi ShahDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Vincent DeStefanoDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Veer ShahDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Paolo BoffettaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. Paolo.boffetta@unibo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a major global health issue, especially among men. While smoking and occupational or environmental exposures are known risks, the role of benzene remains under investigation. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between occupational benzene exposure and lung cancer incidence and mortality. We included cohort and case-control studies mentioned in the 2018 IARC Monograph on benzene and performed a systematic literature review to identify studies published up to 2024 by using PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. We constructed forest plots of relative risk (RR) to visualize and analyze the data. A random-effects model was used to address heterogeneity between studies. Stratified analyses were conducted to explore effect modification. We included 44 independent studies in our meta-analysis. The findings didn't reveal an association between total occupational benzene exposure and lung cancer overall (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.07, p-het ≤ 0.001, 45 risk estimates) or in major industries. Stratified analyses suggested an association in case controls studies (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.10-1.22: 7 risk estimates, p-het = 0.001), and in studies with results adjusted for smoking (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24: 6 risk estimates, p-het = 0.001). There was also an association between high-level benzene exposure and lung cancer (p-trend = 0.03). Publication bias was excluded (p = 0.16). The increased risk after adjustment for smoking and the suggestion of a dose-response, are consistent with the hypothesis of an association between benzene exposure and lung cancer risk.

Indexed as

BenzeneLung cancerMeta-analysisOccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID42479407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.