ReviewObesity surgery2026
Concomitant Metabolic Bariatric Surgery and Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer or Endometrial Intraepitelhelial Neoplasia in Patients with Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review of Early Experience.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe obesity raises endometrial cancer (EC) risk and worsens outcomes. Combining metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) with minimally invasive hysterectomy in a single encounter may streamline care. Following PRISMA 2020, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed (final search January 2026) with a deliberately broad search strategy to identify all reports of concomitant MBS and gynecologic oncologic surgery in adult women with severe obesity and either EC or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Five studies (n = 19) met eligibility. All procedures were minimally invasive. Operative time was longer than for hysterectomy alone, without increased major morbidity or hospital stay. Six-month excess weight loss ranged 42-72%; HbA1c and antihypertensive needs improved. All patients with reported follow-up were disease-free. Concomitant MBS and minimally invasive hysterectomy appears feasible in highly selected patients with severe obesity and EC or EIN. KEY POINTS: Across 5 studies and 19 patients, concomitant MBS with minimally invasive hysterectomy was feasible in highly selected patients with EC or EIN and severe obesity. Operative time is longer than for hysterectomy alone; no major perioperative complications were reported, but the cumulative sample is too small to robustly assess safety. Where reported, six-month excess weight loss ranged 42-72%, with concurrent metabolic improvement (HbA1c and antihypertensive requirements). Short-term oncologic follow-up was encouraging but limited; long-term disease-free and overall survival are not yet established. The available evidence is hypothesis-generating and should not be extrapolated beyond expert multidisciplinary centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479408What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.