ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Accessibility and use of organised stroke care and reperfusion therapies in Europe: results from the SAP-E Stroke Service Tracker 2023.
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOrganised stroke care and reperfusion therapies are key components of modern stroke treatment. We assessed accessibility of organised stroke care and reperfusion therapies in Europe and explored its association with key organisational indicators. PATIENTS AND
methodsStroke Action Plan for Europe (SAP-E) Stroke Service Tracker data from 2023 reported by 47 European countries was assessed. Accessibility indicators included stroke unit (SU) admission proportions, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and EVT treatment proportions. Organisational indicators included the facility density of SU, IVT-capable centres and EVT-capable centres per capita (number of centres per 100,000 population), presence of national stroke plans and quality programmes.
resultsAcross Europe, marked variations were observed in facility density of SU (0.21-0.48), IVT-capable centres (0.19-0.45) and EVT-capable centres (0.06-0.15). SU admission proportions ranked from 0.8% to 96.7%, IVT treatment proportions from 1.3% to 34.7% and EVT treatment proportions from 0.2% to 14.3%. Stroke unit admission proportions were associated with SU density (r = 0.42, P = .03). Density of reperfusion-capable centres showed a possible trending association with IVT treatment proportions (r = 0.34, P = .08), but no association with EVT treatment proportions (r = 0.22, P = .23). Neither the presence of a national stroke plan nor a quality programme were associated with accessibility of SU care, IVT or EVT.
conclusionLarge inequities in access to organised stroke care and reperfusion therapies persist across Europe. At the country level, national stroke plans and quality programmes have not yet translated into effect on accessibility indicators, suggesting that achieving effective implementation takes time or could primarily manifest as within-country improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.