ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Genetic architecture of a Circadian Imbalance Index: genome-wide association, phenome-wide association, and Mendelian randomisation analyses.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCircadian disruption affects multiple aspects of human health, but the genetic architecture of individual susceptibility remains unclear. We examined the genetics of the Circadian Imbalance Index (CII), an additive 0-5 score combining evening chronotype, short/long sleep, high neuroticism, atypical caffeinated coffee intake, and low vitamin D.
methodsWe ran a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of CII in 312,935 European-ancestry UK Biobank participants, compared signals with component-specific and leave-one-component-out (LOCO) GWASs, and tested sex and shift work interactions. CII polygenic score (PRS) PheWAS analyses were evaluated in Mass General Brigham Biobank (N = 50,908) and All of US (N = 98,182), with component-weighted PRS sensitivity analyses. Replication was assessed in Nurses' Health Study II women (N = 11,344). We estimated genetic correlations and performed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) with MR-Egger, weighted median and LOCO sensitivity analyses.
findingsWe identified 27 loci mapping to 72 genes, including genes with reported links to circadian regulation or circadian-related pathways, such as CALCA, DHCR7, KDM5A, HAL, and CRX. Five genes (EPHB1, SERPING1, C12orf74, PLEKHG7, and EEA1) were observed in the CII analysis but not in component-specific analyses. LOCO analyses indicated that the CII genetic signal was not reducible to any single component. The CII PRS was associated with metabolic and psychiatric phenotypes. CII was genetically correlated with insomnia, mood swings, body mass index, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction. MR analyses provided suggestive directional evidence, strongest for reverse associations of mood swings and coronary artery disease with CII.
interpretationThe CII captures a polygenic composite susceptibility signal associated with cardiometabolic and mood outcomes, with suggestive evidence of directional relationships.
fundingEuropean Research Council Advanced Grant CLOCKrisk (101053225).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.