ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing for Early Diagnosis and Detection of Treatment Response, Minimal Residual Disease, and Recurrence in Gastroesophageal Cancer.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have high mortality rates with poor prognosis, especially at late stages. This is partly due to unspecific symptoms at early stages, early treatment resistance, and recurrence after curative-intent treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained attention for early cancer diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring. This narrative review summarizes the recent developments of genomic ctDNA analysis for early GEC diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring across 57 relevant studies. For early diagnosis, several studies combined genomic ctDNA analysis with other ctDNA approaches or serum biomarkers. These approaches achieved high sensitivities and specificities in cancer detection within GEC while accurately predicting the tissue of origin, The use of genomic ctDNA analysis has also been studied for longitudinal monitoring of GEC patients during and after various treatment regimens. Studies have shown that ctDNA dynamics is highly consistent with treatment response and disease progression. CtDNA could frequently detect disease progression before conventional methods, thereby displaying its potential application in longitudinal monitoring. Genomic ctDNA analysis could also detect recurrence after curative-intent treatment and, in many cases, before clinical detection. However, ctDNA has low abundance in total cell-free DNA during low-burden disease. Additionally, methodological variation in ctDNA processing and quantification complicates interpretation across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42481836What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.