Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481836›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing for Early Diagnosis and Detection of Treatment Response, Minimal Residual Disease, and Recurrence in Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Mikkel Møller Henriksen, Alexander Venzel Rudbeck, Sönke Detlefsen, Michael Bau Mortensen, Per Pfeiffer, Torben A Kruse, Mads Thomassen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikkel Møller HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. mmhenriksen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-3514
Alexander Venzel RudbeckDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sönke DetlefsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Michael Bau MortensenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Per PfeifferDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Torben A KruseDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mads ThomassenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have high mortality rates with poor prognosis, especially at late stages. This is partly due to unspecific symptoms at early stages, early treatment resistance, and recurrence after curative-intent treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained attention for early cancer diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring. This narrative review summarizes the recent developments of genomic ctDNA analysis for early GEC diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring across 57 relevant studies. For early diagnosis, several studies combined genomic ctDNA analysis with other ctDNA approaches or serum biomarkers. These approaches achieved high sensitivities and specificities in cancer detection within GEC while accurately predicting the tissue of origin, The use of genomic ctDNA analysis has also been studied for longitudinal monitoring of GEC patients during and after various treatment regimens. Studies have shown that ctDNA dynamics is highly consistent with treatment response and disease progression. CtDNA could frequently detect disease progression before conventional methods, thereby displaying its potential application in longitudinal monitoring. Genomic ctDNA analysis could also detect recurrence after curative-intent treatment and, in many cases, before clinical detection. However, ctDNA has low abundance in total cell-free DNA during low-burden disease. Additionally, methodological variation in ctDNA processing and quantification complicates interpretation across studies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualStomach NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkerCirculating tumor DNAEarly diagnosisEsophageal cancerGastric cancerLongitudinal monitoring

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.