ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Temporal delays in branch development contribute to vegetative meristem maintenance in perennial grasses.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retention of vegetative meristems beyond the first year of flowering underpins perennial growth, yet the developmental mechanisms causing it remain unresolved. To address this knowledge gap, we quantified vegetative shoot branching and flowering architecture in eight annual-perennial species pairs within the grass subfamily Pooideae, tracking thousands of vegetative and reproductive branches within a phylogenetic framework to test whether perenniality is maintained through temporal delays in branch development or spatial segregation of vegetative and reproductive branches. Annuals, except Hordeum vulgare, produced branches at shorter intervals, flowered earlier, and showed more synchronized flowering than their perennial counterparts. Across life histories, flowering progressed from older to younger branches, with little evidence for consistent spatial segregation of vegetative and reproductive branches. In perennial species in the core group, younger branches during the first year of flowering had a lower probability of floral transition, reflecting delayed branch initiation and age-dependent responsiveness to floral signals. Core perennial species branched faster than noncore perennials, indicating lineage-specific differences in developmental pace. Our findings demonstrate that perennial Pooideae retain vegetative meristems through temporal delays in branch development rather than age-independent spatial partitioning, providing a developmental mechanism for perennial persistence and a trait directly relevant to perennializing annual grain crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.