ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Deep Learning-Based Anatomical Segmentation of the Foot and Ankle: A Multi-View Radiograph Approach.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to develop deep learning models that can identify and separate the shapes of 14 bones in the foot and ankle using multi-view radiographs and predict their masks. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively collected 273 radiographs from 99 patients with anatomically normal feet, including anteroposterior (AP), oblique (OBL), and lateral (LAT) views, obtained between January 2020 and December 2021. In each view, 14 bones were segmented using AP and OBL radiographs and 6 bones using LAT radiographs. Ground truth masks were manually annotated by two radiology technologists and reviewed by an emergency medicine physician. Two deep learning models, a fully convolutional network (FCN) with ResNet-50 and DeepLabv3 with ResNet-50, were independently fine-tuned for semantic segmentation and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation.
resultsIn the AP and OBL views, both models attained mean intersection over union (mIoU) values ranging from 0.899 to 0.975 and from 0.875 to 0.978, respectively. In the LAT view, mIoU values varied from 0.926 to 0.976 for FCN-ResNet-50 and from 0.872 to 0.961 for DeepLabv3. FCN-ResNet-50 achieved slightly higher mIoU values than DeepLabv3, with statistically significant differences identified between the two models in the overall OBL view and across the 14 specific bones (
conclusionThe FCN-ResNet-50 and DeepLabv3 models could be effective in automatically segmenting foot and ankle bone structures using multi-view radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.