Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482865›Full record

ReviewJPhys photonics2026

Optimization of light source parameters for photoacoustic imaging: trade-offs, technologies, and clinical considerations.

Kalloor Joseph Francis, David Veysset, Hwidon Lee, Brett E Bouma, Gijs van Soest

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPhys photonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalloor Joseph FrancisDepartment of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9766-7140
David VeyssetWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-1983
Hwidon LeeDepartment of Optics and Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-0715
Brett E BoumaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4531-2206
Gijs van SoestDepartment of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6474-3100

Funding

TRD3: Percutaneous and Interstitial ImagingP41EB015903 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Brett E Bouma · 2012 to 2026
$22.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of light sources for photoacoustic imaging, a biomedical imaging technology, remains a critical yet under-informed topic. This review discusses the key trade-offs in light source parameters (e.g. wavelength, pulse energy, repetition frequency), safety, and practical considerations. We analyse these factors in the context of underlying imaging physics and the limits imposed by regulatory standards across various wavelength ranges. Attention is given to light source selection for photoacoustic tomography, optical and acoustic resolution microscopy, and endoscopy, which pose different requirements for pulse energies and repetition frequencies, to achieve real-time imaging at the desired depth. Current PA imaging light sources, including high-power lasers with optical parametric oscillators, fibre lasers, laser diodes, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, and light-emitting diodes, are reviewed in terms of wavelength availability, energy, repetition frequency, beam quality, portability, and safety. Clinically viable systems require careful consideration of fibre coupling limitations, maximum permissible exposure at the tissue interface, imaging field of view, and signal-to-noise ratio. Further practical considerations include energy efficiency and thermal management in clinical settings. We also outline the present gaps in the available light source technologies, where the development of new sources may enable new PA imaging capabilities, both scientific and clinical. By offering an overview of these considerations, this review aims to guide researchers, industry, and clinicians in selecting optimal light sources and advancing the development of light sources that address current gaps in available technology.

Indexed as

clinical translationlight source selectionmaximum permissible exposureoptoacousticphotoacousticsignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID42482865
PMCPMC13386801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.