ReviewJPhys photonics2026
Optimization of light source parameters for photoacoustic imaging: trade-offs, technologies, and clinical considerations.
Review in JPhys photonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selection of light sources for photoacoustic imaging, a biomedical imaging technology, remains a critical yet under-informed topic. This review discusses the key trade-offs in light source parameters (e.g. wavelength, pulse energy, repetition frequency), safety, and practical considerations. We analyse these factors in the context of underlying imaging physics and the limits imposed by regulatory standards across various wavelength ranges. Attention is given to light source selection for photoacoustic tomography, optical and acoustic resolution microscopy, and endoscopy, which pose different requirements for pulse energies and repetition frequencies, to achieve real-time imaging at the desired depth. Current PA imaging light sources, including high-power lasers with optical parametric oscillators, fibre lasers, laser diodes, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, and light-emitting diodes, are reviewed in terms of wavelength availability, energy, repetition frequency, beam quality, portability, and safety. Clinically viable systems require careful consideration of fibre coupling limitations, maximum permissible exposure at the tissue interface, imaging field of view, and signal-to-noise ratio. Further practical considerations include energy efficiency and thermal management in clinical settings. We also outline the present gaps in the available light source technologies, where the development of new sources may enable new PA imaging capabilities, both scientific and clinical. By offering an overview of these considerations, this review aims to guide researchers, industry, and clinicians in selecting optimal light sources and advancing the development of light sources that address current gaps in available technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.