ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
ANCA-associated vasculitis: a phase-oriented therapeutic framework from immunopathology to precision treatment.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides are rare, severe autoimmune diseases characterized by necrotizing small-vessel inflammation, heterogeneous organ involvement, and a substantial burden of relapse, damage, and treatment-related toxicity. Although their management has traditionally been framed around the dichotomy between remission induction and maintenance, this model does not fully capture the dynamic immunopathological transitions that occur across the disease course. In this review, we propose a phase-oriented therapeutic framework that integrates disease stage, dominant pathogenic mechanisms, organ-specific risk, and unmet clinical needs to support a more precise and clinically actionable approach to treatment. Within this model, the induction phase is focused on rapid control of active inflammation and prevention of irreversible organ damage, with treatment intensity increasingly informed by clinical severity, renal histopathology, complement activation, ANCA specificity, and patient-level vulnerability to toxicity. The consolidation phase represents a biologically active post-induction window in which clinical remission must be stabilized, residual autoreactive immune circuits further suppressed, and glucocorticoids tapered. Rituximab-based strategies exemplify this concept by sustaining B-cell depletion after remission induction rather than replacing the pathogenic target with non-specific immunosuppression. The maintenance phase is then reframed as a period of individualized surveillance, relapse prevention, toxicity minimization, and selective de-escalation. For eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a purely phase-based model is insufficient, and treatment should also account for the relative contribution of eosinophilic inflammation and autoimmune vasculitis, although it should not be reduced to ANCA status alone. Overall, this framework shifts AAV management from a rigid induction-maintenance sequence toward a mechanism-based strategy aimed at matching therapeutic ambition to immunopathology, evidence strength, and patient-specific risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.