ArticleCJC open2026
Inequitable Access to Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation and Adverse Outcomes in a Publicly Funded Healthcare System.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remoteness and emergency care pathways for ambulance-attended atrial fibrillation: a population-based linked cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although all Canadians have universal coverage for hospital-based care, only limited data describe the determinants of access to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in Canada. Methods: This population-based cohort study from Alberta, Canada (2013-2020) included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with new-onset AF in whom a rhythm-control strategy was desired. Factors associated with ablation within 5 years were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. The association between ablation and outcomes was assessed in a propensity score-matched cohort using Cox proportional hazard models; the time to ablation was treated as a time-varying covariate to mitigate immortal time bias. Results: Of 11,844 patients, 8.7% (n = 1014) received ablation within 5 years of diagnosis. The mean cohort age was 64.6 ± 14.0 years; 35.1% were female; and the mean Conclusion: There are disparities in ablation rates based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Lack of access to ablation is associated with poorer clinical outcomes at 5 years. Our results support the importance of equity-driven health services planning and advocacy to ensure fair access to ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.