ArticleCJC open2026
Depression As an Independent Predictor of Nonadherence to Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Latin American Country.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and the primary cause of death from noncommunicable diseases in Colombia. Cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) are effective strategies to reduce cardiovascular mortality, improve functional capacity, and decrease healthcare costs. However, their success depends on patient adherence, which remains suboptimal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where CRPs are underutilized and understudied. The prognostic impact of anxiety and depression on adherence remains largely unexplored in such countries, where socioeconomic, cultural, and healthcare access barriers may amplify their impact. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients aged ≥ 18 years who entered a CRP at a Colombian teaching hospital, between 2004 and 2014. Baseline anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Adherence was defined as attending ≥ 30 of 36 sessions. Nested logistic regression models examined the prognostic association between anxiety, depression, and nonadherence, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Results: Among 3659 patients (median age 62 years; 66.2% male), overall nonadherence reached 51.1%. Anxiety was present in 27.9% of patients, and depression in 16.5%. Depression independently predicted nonadherence (odds ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.31), after adjustment for confounders. Anxiety lost its statistical significance in adjusted models (odds ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.19). Conclusions: Depression at program entry is a modifiable independent predictor of nonadherence in a Latin American CRP. Routine psychological screening and early management of depressive symptoms could enhance adherence and optimize CRPs' effectiveness in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.