ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Drug-associated inflammatory bowel disease: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS and JADER databases.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several medications have been linked to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the association between most drugs and IBD remains unclear. This study aimed to identify medications most frequently reported in connection with IBD by analyzing large-scale data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japan Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Methods: We extracted reports of drug-associated IBD adverse events from FAERS and performed external validation using JADER. Disproportionality analyses of suspected drugs were conducted using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Additional analyses included time-to-onset (TTO) assessment, Weibull distribution modeling, and subgroup analyses by age, sex, and IBD subtype to evaluate signal stability and clinical characteristics. Results: The FAERS database yielded 52,395 reports of drug-associated IBD, corresponding to 50,426 patients.Females accounted for a higher proportion of reports than males, with the majority of cases occurring in individuals aged 18-64 years. The annual number of reports showed an overall upward trend. Among drugs reported at least 50 times, 17 met all four algorithmic threshold criteria and were classified as positive signals. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest by reporting frequency, whereas isotretinoin demonstrated the strongest signal intensity. External validation using JADER confirmed consistent signals for certain anti-TNF-α inhibitors, anti-interleukin biologic agents, conventional immunosuppressants, and antibiotics. Time-to-onset analysis revealed that the median onset of IBD occurred within one year for most drug-associated cases. The Weibull model indicated an "early failure-type" onset pattern for the majority of positive signals. Conclusion: From a pharmacovigilance perspective, this study provides a comprehensive overview of medications associated with IBD, offering clinically relevant insights. Our findings deliver real-world evidence to support the identification and monitoring of drug-associated IBD; however, confirmation in large prospective cohort studies remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.