ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Clinical implications of free triiodothyronine levels and diagnostic revisions in antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Low triiodothyronine (T3) syndrome has been associated with initial clinical severity and poor long-term functional outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis (AE). However, its prognostic implications in antibody-negative AE remain unclear. The objective of this study was to explore the clinical significance of low T3 syndrome in patients with antibody-negative AE, and to assess the clinical characteristics of patients reclassified with alternative diagnoses during follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients initially diagnosed with antibody-negative AE between January 2016 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of low T3 syndrome. Demographics, clinical features, and ancillary test results were compared between the subgroups. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were used to evaluate neurological function during hospitalization and at the 12-month follow-up. In addition, we analyzed reclassified patients and their clinical outcomes to improve clinical management of antibody-negative AE. Results: Of the 84 patients initially diagnosed with antibody-negative AE at discharge, eight were reclassified during their disease course (non-autoimmune encephalitis, n=4; paraneoplastic encephalitis, n=3; neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, n=1; these eight patients were defined as reclassified group) and were excluded from the antibody-negative AE group. A total of 76 patients were ultimately enrolled. Of these, 23.68% presented with low T3 syndrome during the acute phase. Subgroup analysis further showed that patients with low T3 syndrome had a higher incidence of consciousness disturbances (p = 0.048), more frequent motor impairments, and higher scores on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) throughout hospitalization. Overall, 61.84% (47/76) of patients achieved a favorable prognosis, whereas 38.16% (29/76) had an unfavorable outcome. Notably, low T3 syndrome was associated with poor prognosis in univariable analysis but not after multivariable adjustment. Discharge mRS was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.293, 95% CI 0.103-0.834, p = 0.021). Furthermore, the reclassified group demonstrated a higher recurrence rate compared with the antibody-negative AE group. Conclusion: Acute-phase low T3 syndrome is common in antibody-negative AE but appears to reflect disease severity rather than serving as an independent prognostic biomarker; discharge mRS is a more reliable predictor. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic role of thyroid hormone alterations in this population. Furthermore, a subset of patients (8/84, 9.5%) initially diagnosed with antibody-negative AE received alternative diagnoses after 12 months of follow-up, highlighting diagnostic uncertainty and the urgent need to identify clinical red flags for re-evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.