ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Recent research progress and future directions of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to now, Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a type of cerebrovascular emergency with high incidence, mortality and disability rates. The secondary brain injury following ICH involves a series of complex pathophysiological mechanisms, including the space-occupying and edema effects of hematoma, abnormal mediation of multiple cell signaling pathways, intense inflammatory storms and immune responses, structural and functional damage to the blood-brain barrier(BBB), progressive increase in intracranial pressure, early hematoma expansion, and neurotoxic effects of blood decomposition product. Over the past few decades, although substantial progress has been made in the construction of risk prediction models, optimization of acute treatment strategies, and improvement of long-term prognosis assessment systems, and dues to the advancement of neuroimaging techniques, improvement in neurocritical care, and innovation in minimally invasive neurosurgery, the overall mortality and disability rates of patients have shown a downward trend. However, it is regrettable that the neurological function recovery of survivors is still generally poor, and the long-term functional improvement rate is very low. Despite extensive and in-depth exploration of the best drug intervention targets and optimal surgical methods for ICH through multiple basic research and clinical trials, these efforts have not yet translated into breakthroughs in clinical treatment outcomes or significant improvements in patient prognosis. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the epidemiological characteristics of spontaneous ICH, the mediation mechanisms of key signaling pathways, the dynamic process of BBB disruption, potential immune-related therapeutic targets, exploration directions of novel drug targets, core mechanisms of secondary brain injury, and key research directions in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.