ArticleMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2026
Perinatal Outcomes of Subgroups of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among Twin Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies, comparing different gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) subgroups with pregnancies without GDM. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies was performed from January 2014 to December 2022. GDM was diagnosed based on the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for the 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Women with twin pregnancies were divided into four groups: healthy control, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT), and IFG + GIGT. Poisson regression models were performed to compare perinatal outcomes between these groups, including large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal unit admission, neonatal jaundice, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Generalized estimation equation models were utilized to address intertwin correlation. Results: A total of 2162 women with twin pregnancies were eligible for analysis. IFG was associated with an increased risk of having large for gestational age infants (adjusted risk ratio (a Conclusion: The present findings revealed differences in perinatal outcomes between women with twin pregnancies with subgroups of GDM and without GDM. Classification of GDM by fasting glucose and post-load glucose may benefit risk stratification in the perinatal management of twin pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.