Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483291›Full record

ArticleMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2026

Perinatal Outcomes of Subgroups of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among Twin Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Jinping Feng, Demei Lu, Lijuan Wang, Dazhi Fan, Zixing Zhou, Gengdong Chen, Pengsheng Li, Ruifeng Ou, Baoshan Chen, Jie Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinping FengDepartment of Nursing, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Demei LuDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Dazhi FanFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, the Affiliated Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Zixing ZhouFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, the Affiliated Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Gengdong ChenFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, the Affiliated Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Pengsheng LiFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, the Affiliated Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Ruifeng OuDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Baoshan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Yanjin LiDepartment of Obstetrics, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Dongxin LinFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, the Affiliated Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies, comparing different gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) subgroups with pregnancies without GDM. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies was performed from January 2014 to December 2022. GDM was diagnosed based on the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for the 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Women with twin pregnancies were divided into four groups: healthy control, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT), and IFG + GIGT. Poisson regression models were performed to compare perinatal outcomes between these groups, including large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal unit admission, neonatal jaundice, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Generalized estimation equation models were utilized to address intertwin correlation. Results: A total of 2162 women with twin pregnancies were eligible for analysis. IFG was associated with an increased risk of having large for gestational age infants (adjusted risk ratio (a Conclusion: The present findings revealed differences in perinatal outcomes between women with twin pregnancies with subgroups of GDM and without GDM. Classification of GDM by fasting glucose and post-load glucose may benefit risk stratification in the perinatal management of twin pregnancies.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitus, gestationalFasting glucosePerinatal outcomesPost-load glucoseTwin pregnancies

Identifiers

PMID42483291
PMCPMC13387778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.