ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Perceptual distortions in PredNet and quantification of top-down/bottom-up flow.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceptual distortions are widely observed in various psychiatric diseases, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Recent Bayesian models of psychiatric disorders and learning disabilities propose a general theory grounded on the concept of "aberrant precision." However, these models have yet to be used as phenomenological models for visual distortions because previous models usually only deal with a low-dimensional input with Laplace approximation. Such assumptions are necessary for precision to be well-defined; otherwise, the explanation based on aberrant precision was hardly applicable. This study addresses these limitations using the predictive coding-based deep neural network PredNet and a new analysis method inspired by the precision account using the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). We found that the visual distortion happened when trained with more extended temporal contexts, which was mitigated when we increased the weight of the prediction error of the top layer. From HSIC analysis, we showed that this weight increase enhanced the top-down information flow in prediction, which led to an enhanced ability to capture global features of the visual input, such as rotation and average brightness and hue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.