ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Risk factors and intervention strategies for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the association between absence of early pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and in-hospital DVT after IVT for AIS, and further explored the clinical characteristics associated with failure to initiate timely prophylaxis. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 197 patients with AIS treated with IVT between January 2021 and April 2024. Early pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was defined as anticoagulant prophylaxis initiated within 24-48 h after IVT after repeat neuroimaging excluded intracranial hemorrhage. The primary outcome was in-hospital lower extremity DVT confirmed by venous ultrasonography. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with non-initiation of early prophylaxis and to examine the association between absence of early prophylaxis and DVT. Results: Among 197 patients, 118 (59.9%) received early prophylaxis and 79 (40.1%) did not. Overall, 32 patients (16.2%) developed in-hospital DVT. DVT occurred more frequently in patients without early prophylaxis than in those receiving early prophylaxis (30.4% vs. 6.8%, Conclusions: Among patients with AIS treated with IVT, absence of early pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was associated with higher odds of in-hospital DVT. Notably, a risk-treatment paradox was observed: patients with higher baseline thrombotic risk (e.g., severe stroke, atrial fibrillation, elevated D-dimer) were less likely to receive early prophylaxis, presumably due to concerns about post-thrombolysis hemorrhagic transformation. These findings suggest a clinically relevant prevention gap, although the observed association should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design and non-randomized treatment allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.