Evidence mapPaperPMID 42483540Full record

ReviewKidney international supplements2026

IgA nephropathy management: what does the future hold?

Sydney C W Tang, Heather N Reich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international supplements, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sydney C W TangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Heather N ReichDivision of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased understanding of the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has led to the development of new investigational agents tailored to this disease. The identification of surrogate markers of early treatment benefit has facilitated regulatory approval of these novel therapies. The surge in available data from several completed trials has prompted the recent revision of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines for IgAN. Two agents have been fully approved for use in patients with IgAN in some regions: Nefecon, an oral targeted-release formulation of budesonide, and sparsentan, a dual endothelin A and angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Iptacopan and atrasentan are conditionally approved on the basis of proteinuria data; full approval will be evaluated once data on kidney function are available. With the potential future expansion of the IgAN treatment armamentarium, a dual approach to IgAN management is highly likely, addressing the overproduction of galactose-deficient IgA1 and downstream consequences of deposition of nephritogenic immune complexes, as well as considering supportive strategies targeting common non-disease-specific ongoing nephron loss. Combination therapies with different classes of drugs will likely become the new standard of care for chronic kidney disease as they target distinct pathogenic mechanisms or "hits" (namely, hemodynamic, immune, galactose-deficient IgA1-generating, inflammatory, and fibrotic processes involved in IgAN and chronic kidney disease progression). To improve personalized care for patients with IgAN, further research is needed to identify and validate noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, and monitoring response.

Indexed as

future treatmentsguidelinesIgA1IgA nephropathy

Identifiers

PMID42483540
PMCPMC13387148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.