ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2026
Temporal trends and spatial distribution of leishmaniasis based on biomes in Brazil, 2007 to 2020.
Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyses based on biomes provide a less fragmented view than usual studies and help the understanding of epidemiological characteristics from different perspectives. We describe the temporal trends and spatial distribution of American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) and visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Brazilian biomes, from 2007 to 2020. This ecological survey used data from the Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System. The Prais-Winsten method was used for temporal analyses. ACL and VL incidences were calculated based on sex and age groups, relative risk considering these two variables, and mortality, lethality, cure, and treatment abandonment rates per biome. The Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, and Caatinga biomes showed a decreasing temporal trend, varying from -1% to -3% for ACL and VL, respectively. Other biomes showed a stationary temporal trend for both diseases. VL had a similar transmission profile in all biomes, affecting children aged 0-4 years regardless of sex. In contrast, ACL mainly affected older adults, except in the Amazon and Pampa, where working-age males were most commonly affected. In all biomes, being a man constituted a risk factor for acquiring these diseases, abandoning treatment, and dying, whereas being a woman configured a factor that favored cure and protected against lethality. Our findings showed a decrease in ACL and VL incidence in most biomes and a stable incidence in other biomes. The results of our study showed that the distinct transmission profiles of ACL and VL have persisted across different biomes with minute differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.