ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Automated identification of cardiac amyloidosis using cross-modal neural networks on [Formula: see text]-Pyrophosphate SPECT imaging and clinical data.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, early identification of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is challenging yet critical for effective treatment. In this work, the modeled endpoint is scan positivity on [Formula: see text] scintigraphy, defined by the semi-quantitative Perugini visual grade (Grade 2-3 versus Grade 0-1). Two multimodal deep-learning frameworks, including Late Fusion (LF) and Cross-Modal Fusion Network (CMF-Net), are proposed to combine [Formula: see text] scintigraphy with clinical metadata for automated detection. On a curated cohort of 109 patients (62 positive, 47 negative), fusion models consistently outperformed image-only convolutional neural networks (CNNs): CMF-Net raised average accuracy by 6.9 percentage points and LF by 5.4. EfficientNet CMF-Net achieved peak accuracy 90.9% and F1-score 91.4%. Notable gains included a +30.8 percentage points sensitivity(recall) for ResNet-34 with CMF-Net and ResNet-50 LF sensitivity of 94.9%. These results show that integrating imaging and text/numeric clinical data yields superior, reproducible detection of [Formula: see text] scan positivity and may streamline scan interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484776What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.