Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484779›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026

Effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes: randomized trials revisited.

Youqing Wang, Sha Sha, Tafirenyika Gwenzi, Ben Schöttker, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Youqing WangCancer Prevention Graduate School, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-7667
Sha ShaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology of Early Cancer Detection, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tafirenyika GwenziDivision of Clinical Epidemiology of Early Cancer Detection, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology of Early Cancer Detection, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerCancer Prevention Graduate School, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. h.brenner@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-1572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular diseases in populations with different baseline vitamin D distributions, by emulating the VITAL and D-Health trials within the UK Biobank. We emulated randomized trials using subcohorts of the UK Biobank selected to match the inclusion criteria of the VITAL and D-Health trials (n = 237,502 and 185,809, respectively). Exposures were defined as increases in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D concentrations of 30 nmol/L and 38 nmol/L, corresponding to the intervention effects in the trials. Outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Expected hazard ratios over trial median follow-up durations of 5.3 and 5.7 years were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Vitamin D insufficiency was more common in the UK Biobank than in the original trials. When participants were weighted to match the trial baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin-D distributions, the expected effects became more similar to the largely null findings reported in the original trials. By contrast, among individuals with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin-D concentration as achieved in the trials were associated with significantly lower risks of cardiovascular outcomes, except ischemic stroke. For cardiovascular mortality, hazard ratios ranged from 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.91) across both trial emulations. The largely null findings observed in the trials may partly reflect that the trial populations were predominantly vitamin D-replete. Our emulated trials suggest that substantial cardiovascular benefits from vitamin D supplementation may be expected among populations with low vitamin D status.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesDose–responseEmulationHazard ratioRandomized controlled trialsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID42484779

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.