Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42485000›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Caught in the NET: A Review on the Emerging Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in PDAC Development.

Emily A Godfrey, Slawomir Lukomski, Brian A Boone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily A GodfreyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-8204
Slawomir LukomskiDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Brian A BooneDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI GARY O RANKIN · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
WVU Flow Cytometry and Single Cell Core Facility (FCSCCF)P20GM121322 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Karen H Martin · 2018 to 2026
$22.4M
Mechanisms of anti-tumor activity of group A Streptococcus in pancreatic adenocarcinomaR21CA267302 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BOONE, BRIAN A, LUKOMSKI, SLAWOMIR · 2022 to 2023
$387k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA267302NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121322NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, characterized by poor treatment response. A part of this dismal prognosis can be attributed to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) that renders tumors anti-immunogenic and resistant to immunotherapies. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are a frontline defense in pathogen clearance. However, NETs also play a destructive role in many chronic conditions, such as autoimmune disease and cancer. Recent evidence corroborates the impact of NETs on PDACs pathogenesis by promoting tumor progression and enhancing the immunosuppressive TME. As such, NETs have become an attractive therapeutic target to improve patient outcomes. This review addresses the current research findings on the association of NETs and PDAC progression and future research opportunities in targeted NET therapies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalExtracellular TrapsNeutrophilsPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansTumor Microenvironmentcancer therapiesneutrophil extracellular trapspancreatic ductal adenocarcinomatumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42485000
PMCPMC13392335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.