SynthesisThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Dyadic Capability in Stroke Survivors and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Integrated Concept Analysis.
Synthesis in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough educational and transitional interventions improve preparedness after stroke, it remains unclear whether this translates into real-world capability within stroke survivor-caregiver dyads. The concept of capability may better capture the ability to convert knowledge and resources into meaningful action, yet it remains poorly defined and operationalized in stroke research. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on capability and related constructs in stroke survivors and caregivers and to clarify the concept of dyadic capability through integrated concept analysis.
methodsA systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with protocol registration in PROSPERO. Seven databases were searched from inception to May 2025. A total of 2318 records were screened and 373 full-text articles assessed, with 22 studies included. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Findings were synthesized narratively and integrated with a Walker and Avant concept analysis.
resultsDyadic capability emerged as a multidimensional construct characterized by 3 defining attributes: self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation. Antecedents included poststroke disability and contextual factors, while consequences encompassed improved autonomy, enhanced dyadic quality of life, reduced caregiver burden, and more effective care management. Notably, no validated instruments specifically measuring dyadic capability were identified.
conclusionsDyadic capability represents a critical yet underdeveloped construct in stroke care. Its clarification provides a theoretical foundation for future measurement development and for designing nursing interventions that enhance the translation of knowledge into real-world action in stroke survivor-caregiver dyads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.