Observational studyBMJ open2026
Cross-sectional analysis of variation in diagnosis of Lewy body dementia in three English regions: data from the DETERMIND programme.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to examine regional differences in the relationship between core clinical features assessed using the Improving the DIAgnosis and Management Of Neurodegenerative Dementias of Lewy body type in the NHS (DIAMOND-Lewy) dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) Assessment Toolkit and memory service diagnoses of Lewy body dementia (LBD).
designSecondary analysis of a multicentre observational study.
settingMemory clinics in three sites across England (North East, London and South East) from July 2019 to March 2023.
participants935 individuals with a new memory service diagnosis of dementia enrolled in the DETERMinants of quality of life, care and costs, and consequences of INequalities in people with Dementia and their carers (DETERMIND) programme. OUTCOME MEASURES: Core clinical features of DLB were assessed using the DLB Assessment Toolkit. The relationship between core clinical features and memory service diagnosis of LBD was examined using Bayesian probit models.
resultsThere were higher rates of LBD diagnosis from memory services in the cohort in North East England compared with the London and South East centres (11% vs 4%; risk ratio (RR)=1.72 (1.35-2.08)) and evidence of a regional moderating effect on the relationship between clinical features and LBD diagnosis (RR=1.73 (1.26-2.40)).All core clinical features of DLB were associated with LBD diagnosis in North East England, whereas visual hallucinations were the most influential diagnostic feature in London and the South East (RR=3.18 (2.29-4.02)).
conclusionsRegional differences in LBD diagnosis in UK memory services appear to reflect different rates of recognition of specific LBD clinical features. Routinely using a standardised DLB Assessment Toolkit and improving awareness of non-hallucination features in LBD could help to address this disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.