Evidence mapPaperPMID 42486909Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Feasibility of a noninvasive photoplethysmography-based wearable chest patch for cardiac output assessment during exercise compared with thermodilution right heart catheterization.

Bernd Stücker, Alexander Hoss, Jafer Haschemi, Fabian Voß, Amin Polzin, Malte Kelm, Christian Jung, Oliver Maier

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernd StückerDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alexander HossDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Jafer HaschemiDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Fabian VoßDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Amin PolzinDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Malte KelmDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Christian JungDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Oliver MaierDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. oliver.maier@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring with cardiac output (CO) assessment is usually based on invasive methods that are associated with potential complications. This study compared CO measurements during exercise obtained from a noninvasive photoplethysmography (PPG)-based chest patch monitor with those obtained from invasive thermodilution-based right heart catheterization in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). CO was assessed at rest, during passive leg raises, and during 20 Watt (W) of bicycle exercise. Nine patients (67% female) with a mean age of 74.1 ± 12.1 years provided a total of 27 paired measurements. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of -0.72 L/min (95% CI - 1.16 to - 0.29) with 95% limits of agreement of - 2.88 to 1.43 L/min and a percentage error of 33%. The CO values obtained by thermodilution and the PPG patch were strongly correlated (r = 0.774; p < 0.001) with a concordance of r = 0.88 (p = 0.002) for the rest-to-20 W change. In this single-center feasibility study, a noninvasive PPG-based chest patch was feasible during exercise right heart catheterization and tracked exercise-induced changes in cardiac output well. Wearable monitoring may offer a low-risk, complementary approach to hemodynamic assessment, but these findings require confirmation in a larger validation cohort.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCardiac OutputExerciseHeart FailurePhotoplethysmographyWearable Electronic DevicesAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThermodilutionExercise right heart catheterizationHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionHemodynamic monitoringPatch sensorWearables

Identifiers

PMID42486909
PMCPMC13392229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.