Evidence mapPaperPMID 42487009Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

The impact of physical activity on children's attention and math performance: A meta-analysis.

Qing Li, Zhaoxu Zhang, Zihao Zhong, Xiaoying Lu, Chuanli Wang, Chenmu Li, Lan Li, Dong Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qing LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China.
Zhaoxu ZhangSchool of Physical Education and Training, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Zihao ZhongSchool of Physical Education and Health, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China.
Xiaoying LuSchool of Literature and Media, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China.
Chuanli WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China.
Chenmu LiSchool of Education, City University of Macau, Macau, China. 51229@gzsport.edu.cn.
Lan LiBelarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus.
Dong LiSchool of Physical Education and Health, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China. lidong58999@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although physical activity has been associated with cognitive and academic benefits in children and adolescents, the intervention characteristics most relevant to attention and mathematics performance remain unclear. This study systematically compares intervention types and parameters to inform targeted cognitive enhancement strategies. RCTs published up to October 2025 were identified through systematic searches of four databases. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment (TESTEX; RoB 2.0). Network meta-analysis and related analyses were conducted in Stata 15.1 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Forty RCTs (28 attention; 18 mathematics) were included. Physical activity interventions showed small positive pooled effects on attention (SMD = 0.19) and mathematics achievement (SMD = 0.21) in the primary random-effects analyses. However, trim-and-fill analyses imputed potentially missing studies for both outcomes, and the 95% CIs of the adjusted estimates included the null value, suggesting that the pooled estimates may be sensitive to small-study effects. For attention, larger descriptive effects were observed for 30-45-min sessions (SMD = 0.30), ≤ 3 sessions/week (SMD = 0.17), and programs lasting < 6 weeks (SMD = 0.42); resistance training ranked highest in SUCRA. For mathematics, larger descriptive effects were observed for sessions < 30 min (SMD = 0.30), 3-4 sessions/week (SMD = 0.08), and programs lasting 6-9 weeks (SMD = 0.49); physically active academic lessons showed favorable trends.

conclusionThis review suggests that physical activity interventions are associated with small positive improvements in attention and mathematics performance among children and adolescents. Descriptive subgroup patterns indicate that attention outcomes showed more favorable patterns in shorter programs with 30-45-min sessions, whereas mathematics performance showed more favorable descriptive patterns for brief, classroom-based physically active lessons integrating mathematics content. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because subgroup comparisons were descriptive, formal tests of differences between subgroups were not conducted, and some network estimates were imprecise.

trial registrationRegistration and protocol CRD420251118483. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Physical activity may support cognitive and academic outcomes in children and adolescents. • Previous reviews have not fully compared intervention types and exercise parameters for attention and mathematics outcomes.. WHAT IS NEW: • This meta-analysis suggests small positive effects of physical activity on attention and mathematics performance. • Intervention rankings and subgroup patterns should be interpreted cautiously because of heterogeneity and uncertainty in some estimates.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAttentionExerciseMathematicsAdolescentChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAttentionChildren and adolescentsMath performanceNetwork meta-analysisPhysical activity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.