ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Collective responsibility and ecological thinking in eating disorders: moving beyond individualistic models of illness and recovery.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eating disorder treatment and recovery are often framed as matters of individual responsibility, with change positioned as dependent on the person's motivation, insight, and willingness to recover. While agency remains important, this paper argues that such framings are too narrow and can obscure the wider conditions that shape both illness and the possibility of recovery. Drawing on ecological systems theory, ecosocial approaches to health, evolutionary psychiatry, and lived experience, this paper develops an account of eating disorders as phenomena that arise within interacting systems of biological vulnerability, interpersonal relationships, sociocultural pressures, institutional arrangements, and political economy. It argues that individualistic models of illness and recovery may contribute to shame, stigma, epistemic injustice, and what is described here as hyper-responsibilisation, particularly where care is fragmented, delayed, or unequally distributed. In contrast, an ecological perspective allows eating disorders to be understood as embodied and socially patterned forms of suffering that cannot be adequately addressed through individual behaviour change alone. The paper concludes that if eating disorders are ecological in their production and maintenance, then responsibility for responding to them must also be ecological. Recommendations are made to support more collective, relational, and structurally informed approaches to prevention, treatment, and recovery.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.