ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
The Mediating Role of AI Ethics Awareness Between AI Attitudes and AI Utilization: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Nursing Students.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Mediating Role of AI Ethics Awareness Between AI Attitudes and AI Utilization: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Nursing Students.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo investigate the mediating role of nursing students' artificial intelligence (AI) ethics awareness between the association of attitudes toward AI technology and perceived AI utilization.
backgroundA paucity of studies exists about the role of AI ethics awareness between attitudes toward AI technology and perceived AI utilization, particularly among nursing students.
methodsA multisite cross-sectional, correlational research participated by nursing students (n = 765) that were consecutively recruited from four nursing colleges (two private and two public owned) in Saudi Arabia. Three standardized self-report scales were utilized to collect data, and covariance-based structural equation modeling, using maximum likelihood estimation and bias-corrected bootstrap method, and mediation analyses were employed for data analyses.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 23.98 years old (SD = 4.40), and majority were females (78.90%), were second year students (33.85%), and had a mean grade point average of 4.16 (SD = 0.65). AI technology attitudes were positively associated with AI ethics awareness (β = 0.84, p = 0.001, and 95% CI = 0.76-0.94) and AI utilization (β = 0.55, p = 0.010, and 95% CI = 0.13-0.97). AI ethics awareness was positively associated with AI utilization (β = 0.41, p = 0.043, and95% CI = 0.01-0.84). Mediation analysis showed that AI technology attitudes were indirectly associated with AI utilization (β = 0.36, p = 0.013, and 95% CI = 0.05-0.68) via the mediation of AI ethics awareness. AI technology attitudes measured 72.05% of the R
conclusionNursing students' AI technology attitudes and AI ethics awareness were positively associated with AI utilization, whereas AI ethics mediated between AI technology attitudes and AI utilization. Policymakers, nursing educational institutions, and educators could integrate AI ethics into nursing curricula to cultivate positive AI attitudes and responsible AI usage, preparing future nurses for an AI-integrated healthcare environment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse administrators in the nursing educational institutions and nurse managers in affiliated clinical training centers should provide a conducive learning environment (i.e., adequate resources, teaching/learning materials, and AI-trained staff) where students can learn AI-integrated technologies through practical or simulated activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.