ArticleAnalytical science advances2026
Design-Assisted Chemometric UV Spectrophotometric Determination of Candesartan Cilexetil, Chlorthalidone and Amlodipine Using Principal Component Regression, Partial Least Squares and Genetic Algorithm-Partial Least Squares Models.
Article in Analytical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a sustainable chemometric-assisted UV spectrophotometric strategy for the simultaneous determination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN), chlorthalidone (CTL) and amlodipine (AML) in laboratory-prepared mixtures and commercial pharmaceutical formulations. Owing to the extensive spectral overlap of the three drugs in the UV region, conventional spectrophotometric methods are inadequate for their direct simultaneous analysis. To address this challenge, multivariate calibration models based on principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS) and genetic algorithm-optimized partial least squares (GA-PLS) were developed, enabling accurate quantification without prior separation or complex sample preparation. A design of experiments (DoE) approach was employed to construct the calibration set, while an independent validation set was generated using orthogonal array-based Latin hypercube sampling (OALHS) to ensure robust external validation across the concentration domain. The GA-PLS model enhanced predictive performance through effective wavelength selection, reducing spectral redundancy and improving model robustness. Furthermore, variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis was employed to identify the most influential spectral variables and provide insight into the spectral regions contributing to analyte quantification. The developed models exhibited excellent analytical performance, characterized by low calibration errors (root mean square error of calibration [RMSEC] < 0.30), strong predictive ability and satisfactory external validation results (RMSEP = 0.2278-0.4419; RRMSEP = 0.1558-0.3978), with recoveries ranging from 99.0% to 100.0%. The sustainability of the proposed methodology was assessed using the multi-colour assessment (MA) tool according to white analytical chemistry principles, yielding a high whiteness score and demonstrating superior environmental performance compared with conventional chromatographic methods. In addition, the graphical layout tool for analytical chemistry evaluation (GLANCE) visualization framework provided a comprehensive graphical assessment of analytical performance and sustainability metrics. The proposed chemometric strategy offers a rapid, reliable, cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative for routine quality control of multicomponent pharmaceutical formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.