ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Enhancing organizational health literacy through pediatric clinical training: Mini-CEX-based formative assessment in case-based learning for pediatric pneumonia-a perspective.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organizational health literacy (OHL) remains a critical yet underexplored dimension of health equity, particularly at the interface between clinical training and patient care. This article proposes a conceptual reframing of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) as an OHL-oriented formative assessment tool within case-based learning for pediatric pneumonia. The OHL-Mini-CEX model integrates three assessment domains-teach-back evaluation, de-jargonization capacity, and empowering guidance-to systematically evaluate residents' communicative competence in addressing health literacy barriers. We delineate the mechanisms through which this instrument operates: embedding equity-conflict scenarios into teaching cases, generating bidirectional formative feedback for both clinicians and organizations, and constructing a closed loop from micro-level training to macro-level health equity outcomes. Implementation challenges, including faculty preparedness gaps and psychometric rigor, are examined alongside integrated strategies drawing on public health collaboration. This perspective advances a theoretically grounded and practically actionable pathway for transforming clinical education into an institutional driver of health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.