ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Impact of nursing strategy based on the 6S management model on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction after Percutaneous Coronary intervention.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the impact of the 6S management model-based nursing program on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methodology: A retrospective analysis included clinical data from 144 AMI patients who underwent PCI at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2024 to October 2025. Patients were matched 1:1 to an observation group (6S nursing) and a control group (conventional nursing), with 72 cases in each group. Rehabilitation-related indicators, cardiac function indexes, activities of daily living (ADL), anxiety levels, and adverse cardiac events were compared between the two groups. Results: The observation group reported lower postoperative oral intake and ambulation times, shorter hospital stays, shorter time to resolution of ipsilateral limb swelling and longer 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distances (P<0.05). Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD), Barthel Index (BI) and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) values showed no between-group differences (P>0.05). Post-intervention, both groups had higher LVEF and BI and lower LVEDD and SAS levels (P<0.05), with the observation group showing more favorable results (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of adverse cardiac events such as angina pectoris and severe arrhythmia after PCI were significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared with conventional nursing care, the 6S management model-based nursing program was associated with more favorable rehabilitation-related indicators, improved cardiac function, better activities of daily living, lower anxiety levels, and reduced incidences of specific adverse cardiac events in AMI patients after PCI. The 6S model optimizes inpatient outcomes by establishing standardized nursing processes, strengthening safety awareness, and ensuring the rigorous execution of rehabilitation measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.