ReviewCancer management and research2026
Pre-Infusion Host-Marrow Vulnerability in CD19- and BCMA-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy: Clonal Hematopoiesis, Hematotoxicity, and Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasia.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD19- and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapies have improved outcomes in relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoid malignancies and multiple myeloma, but late hematologic complications are increasingly relevant as survivorship expands. This narrative review examines how pre-infusion clonal hematopoiesis (CH), clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), marrow reserve, prior genotoxic exposure, inflammatory stress, and disease-platform context shape the risks of prolonged cytopenia and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) after CAR T-cell therapy. Available evidence suggests that high-risk clonal architecture, particularly TP53-mutated or DNA damage response-associated clones, clonal cytopenia, larger or multiple clones, and heavy prior cytotoxic exposure, is more clinically informative than CHIP positivity alone. By contrast, associations between unstratified CH and prolonged cytopenia remain heterogeneous. CD19 lymphoma and BCMA myeloma settings share clonal-selection biology but differ in marrow ecology, treatment history, baseline cytopenia, inflammatory burden, and surveillance windows. For clinical translation, risk assessment should not rely on universal CHIP screening or binary genomic classification. Instead, clonal-risk models, hematotoxicity-risk models, baseline blood counts, inflammatory markers, prior therapy exposure, and disease-platform context should be integrated to identify patients who may benefit from intensified myeloid surveillance, supportive-care planning, and earlier marrow reassessment while preserving access to CAR T-cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.