ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Higher Framingham steatosis index is associated with prevalent breast cancer in women: cross-sectional evidence from NHANES 1999-2018 and an exploratory hospital-based dataset.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic dysfunction and hepatic steatosis-related phenotypes have increasingly been linked to extrahepatic malignancies, including breast cancer. The association between the Framingham Steatosis Index (FSI), a composite index incorporating age and multiple metabolic components, and prevalent breast cancer in women has not been well characterized. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of female participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between FSI and prevalent breast cancer, with FSI analyzed as both a continuous variable and by quartiles. Restricted cubic spline analysis and generalized additive modeling were applied to assess potential non-linearity, and two-piecewise logistic regression was used to explore a possible threshold effect. Component-level and AUC analyses compared FSI with its individual components. An exploratory hospital-based supportive dataset was analyzed to assess whether the continuous association showed a similar direction in a different clinical setting. Results: Among 21,042 women in NHANES, 531 (2.5%) reported a history of breast cancer. In the fully adjusted model, each 1-unit increase in FSI was associated with higher odds of prevalent breast cancer (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16). After additional adjustment for age, the association was substantially attenuated and no longer statistically significant (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.07). Higher FSI quartiles were also associated with greater odds of prevalent breast cancer. Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a non-linear association. In component-level analyses, age showed the strongest association and discriminatory performance among the FSI components, whereas adding FSI to the base model only modestly increased the AUC. In the exploratory hospital-based dataset, FSI was positively associated with breast cancer case status when modeled continuously, but the quartile-based dose-response pattern was not reproduced after full adjustment. Conclusions: In the primary NHANES analysis, higher FSI was associated with prevalent breast cancer status in women; however, this association was substantially attenuated after additional adjustment for age. FSI should therefore be interpreted as a composite marker of metabolic-hepatic burden rather than as an age-independent hepatic steatosis effect or causal biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.