ArticleAmerican journal of neurodegenerative disease2026
Optimizing Alzheimer's prediction with dental care: comparing robust deep learning models in health and retirement study of America.
Article in American journal of neurodegenerative disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research has illustrated links between dental care and Alzheimer's disease, the aim of this study was to examine whether dental care variables can enhance Alzheimer's risk prediction using two models including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) models with health and retirement study data.
methods9,979 HRS participants without cognitive impairment were analysed in this study (mean age 67 years; and 59.8% female, waves 11-15: 2006/2008-2016). Analysis included 52 predictors including demographic, genetic (APOE ε4), health (including dental visit frequency), and psychosocial domains. The outcomes as cognitive impairment and dementia were defined by Langa-Kabeto-Weir criteria. Class imbalance was addressed by SMOTE and missing data were mean imputed. We standardized and reshaped features into five-wave temporal sequences. Data were split into 3 sets: 70% training, 10% validation, and 20% test. LSTM (single layer, 64 units) and TCN (two dilated convolutional layers, 32 channels) models were trained for up to 50 epochs using binary cross-entropy loss with Adam optimizer, learning-rate reduction on plateau, and early stopping based on validation F1. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1, and AUC-ROC were evaluated via Five-fold stratified cross-validation; the optimization of classification thresholds was done by maximizing F1. McNemar's test compared final predictions.
resultsIt was evident that LSTM consistently outperformed TCN as demonstrated by the following results: test accuracy 99.78% vs 79.01%; AUC-ROC 99.95% vs 92.74%; F1-score 99.67% vs 75.27%. Cross-validation consistency (LSTM F1 ~99.6%±0.1% vs TCN ~76.6%±1.5%) and stable validation-test metrics (final validation loss 0.0136 vs 0.3312) showed robust LSTM performance without overfitting. moreover, McNemar's test showed a significant difference (statistic = 2605.36; P<0.001). models with dental care variables showed high sensitivity (~99.8%).
conclusionsEnhancement in Alzheimer's disease risk prediction in older adults was evident when incorporating dental care variables in LSTM-based sequential modeling which suggest potential for early detection. However, further studies in diverse populations and assessment of feature importance is necessary because of reliance on self-reported dental care data and the study's HRS-specific sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.