ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions of infant formulas composition: a comparative study of Spanish pediatricians and pharmacy professionals.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As infant formulas evolve to include bioactive components that mimic breast milk, the knowledge and perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) about these innovations become critical. Pediatricians and pharmacy professionals play complementary roles in recommending and guiding infant formula use. However, disparities in understanding and communication may impact caregiver education and infant health outcomes. This study aims to assess the perceptions of Spanish pediatricians and pharmacy professionals regarding infant formulas, focusing on the recognition of ingredients, the importance attributed to them, and the understanding of their biological functions. Differences between the two professional groups were analyzed to identify gaps and educational needs. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 876 responding Spanish pediatricians ( Results: Surveyed pediatricians reported higher self-perceived knowledge than pharmacy professionals (mean score 7.9 vs. 6.7, Conclusion: Responding pediatricians and pharmacy professionals showed differences in their functional recognition and perception of infant formula ingredients. While the former excelled in the questionnaire-based technical recognition, the latter did so in parental education. Both profiles provide complementary strengths and show opportunities to improve knowledge about some bioactive ingredients. These results suggest potential opportunities for specific ongoing training and collaborative approaches that may help ensure consistent, evidence-based advice for caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.