Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488245›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Proposed Clinical Validation Pathway for the Artificial Intelligence-Driven Integrated Risk Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease (AIRA-CVD): A Translational Framework Integrating Inflammatory Biomarkers, Histopathology, and Machine Learning.

Cfc Ogbuefi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cfc OgbuefiDepartment of Family Medicine, Federal University Teaching Hospital, Owerri, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure despite advances in prevention and treatment. The Artificial Intelligence-Driven Integrated Risk Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease (AIRA-CVD) framework was proposed as a multimodal architecture integrating clinical data, inflammatory biomarkers, imaging findings, and histopathological evidence of vascular remodeling to support precision cardiovascular risk assessment. This technical report presents a structured clinical validation pathway designed to facilitate future implementation and evaluation of the framework. The proposed pathway consists of four sequential phases: retrospective electronic health record analysis, inflammatory biomarker integration, histopathological validation, and prospective clinical implementation. The framework further incorporates a hybrid machine learning architecture, explainable artificial intelligence methodologies, human-in-the-loop clinical oversight, and algorithmic fairness considerations to support transparency, interpretability, and responsible deployment. Potential applications include enhanced cardiovascular risk stratification, earlier identification of high-risk individuals, support for preventive interventions, and integration within clinical decision-support and population health management systems. By providing a translational roadmap for validation and implementation, this report seeks to bridge the gap between computational innovation and patient-centered cardiovascular care while advancing the development of biologically informed artificial intelligence systems in cardiovascular medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiovascular diseasehealth informaticshistopathologyinflammatory biomarkersmachine learningprecision medicinepredictive analyticsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42488245
PMCPMC13391225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.