ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Structural divergence and molecular adaptation of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: We sequenced and assembled the chloroplast (plastome) and mitochondrial (mitogenome) genomes of Results: The plastome exhibited a more conserved structure but a faster nucleotide substitution rate, whereas the mitogenome showed greater structural complexity but a slower substitution rate. Divergence time estimation suggested that rapid differentiation of Crassulaceae species occurred around 7.15 Mya, likely linked to decreasing atmospheric CO₂ levels and the dramatic uplift of the Qinghai‑Tibet Plateau during the Late Miocene. Positive selection analysis identified three candidate genes (matR, ccmFc, and ATP8) under positive selection. Additionally, numerous pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins were detected in the nuclear genome. Discussion: The contrasting evolutionary patterns between the two organellar genomes highlight distinct selective constraints and mutation rates. The identified positively selected genes may contribute to mitochondrial function and stress adaptation. The abundance of nuclear‑encoded PPR proteins suggests a potential repair mechanism via RNA editing that could mitigate UV‑induced DNA damage, offering an adaptive advantage in the high‑altitude environment. Collectively, these findings provide valuable insights into the adaptive evolution of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.