Evidence mapPaperPMID 42488448Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Differences in ginseng quality and soil characteristics in different growth modes of

Keming Cao, Chanpeng Sun, Jia Tao, Linlin Zhang, Xiaoxi Pan, Yue Zhang, Cai Shao, Yiming Guan, Qiuxia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keming CaoInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Chanpeng SunInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Jia TaoInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Linlin ZhangInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Xiaoxi PanInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Yue ZhangInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Cai ShaoInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Yiming GuanInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.
Qiuxia WangInstitute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ginseng has three main growth modes, and there are significant differences in quality among ginseng grown under these different modes; however, the mechanism by which soil nutrients and enzyme activity influence ginsenosides synthesis, leading to differences in quality among ginseng grown under different modes, remains unclear. Methods: We systematically measured soil physicochemical properties, soil enzyme activity, and total ginsenoside along with key monosaponin content in ginseng. Results: The results indicate that wild ginseng soil exhibited significantly higher total carbon, soil organic carbon, catalase, and sucrase activities compared to understory ginseng and cultivated ginseng, with generally higher available potassium levels; Soil from understory ginseng exhibited the highest acid phosphatase activity (60,546.74-71,212.00 U/g), with all indicators falling between wild ginseng and cultivated ginseng; cultivated ginseng soil had lower organic carbon content, and significantly lower urease activity than the other two growth patterns. Regarding ginsenoside content, wild ginseng exhibited the highest total ginsenoside content in both aboveground (7.74%) and belowground (5.28%) parts, with significantly superior levels of key monosides such as Rg1, F2, and Rh4 compared to both understory ginseng and cultivated ginseng. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations between catalase and sucrase activities and total carbon and organic carbon content. Conversely, acid phosphatase activity showed a significant negative correlation with available potassium and phosphorus levels. Discussion: Taken together, the high organic matter content and synergistic high enzyme activity in wild ginseng soil provide ample substrates and energy for ginsenoside synthesis, constituting key factors for its superior quality. These findings provide theoretical support for optimizing ginseng cultivation practices and enhancing product quality.

Indexed as

cultivated ginsengginsenosidesoilunderstory ginsengwild ginseng

Identifiers

PMID42488448
PMCPMC13388324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.