ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting atrial fibrillation risk in middle-aged and older patients with coronary heart disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist, yet existing risk stratification tools inadequately capture the nonlinear, multidimensional determinants of AF in middle-aged and older CHD patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning-based prediction model leveraging electronic medical records (EMR) data. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 47,617 hospitalized CHD patients (January 2020-December 2025) was analyzed. After random forest imputation and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) screening, eight machine learning algorithms were trained and validated (7:3 split). Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) applied for interpretability. Results: LASSO regression identified 16 predictors, with pulse rate, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, creatinine, and triglycerides emerging as the top five contributors. XGBoost outperformed competing models, achieving AUCs of 0.867 (95% CI: 0.862-0.872) in the training set and 0.813 (95% CI: 0.802-0.823) in the validation set. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed nonlinear dose-response relationships for multiple continuous variables. SHAP visualization quantified individualized feature contributions. LIME explanations demonstrated consistent local feature contributions at the individual level. Conclusions: This data-driven, interpretable XGBoost model enables individualized AF risk assessment in middle-aged and older CHD patients, offering a practical tool for early identification and targeted intervention in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.