ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Autoantibody repertoire in lupus nephritis: from pathogenic mechanisms to clinical integration for precision decision-making.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathological depositions in human disease: converging mechanisms in atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and related disorders.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) represents the most severe renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and timely, risk-stratified intervention is essential to mitigate irreversible kidney damage and improve long-term clinical outcomes. The autoantibody repertoire not only constitutes a cornerstone of SLE diagnosis but also serves as a critical pathogenic link between systemic immune dysregulation and site-specific renal injury. This review synthesizes current evidence on established and emerging autoantibodies associated with LN, with an emphasis on their pathogenic contributions to three central mechanisms: immune complex deposition, complement system activation, and direct podocyte injury. We critically evaluate the clinical validity and utility of conventional serological markers, including anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies, for diagnosing LN, monitoring disease activity, and predicting renal flares or progression, while also elucidating the significance of distinct clinical phenotypes such as the antiphospholipid antibody profile. Furthermore, we discuss strategies for integrating multiple autoantibody indices to construct predictive models, as well as the application prospects of novel technologies enabling non-invasive liquid biopsy. Finally, the challenges and future directions of autoantibody-guided individualized therapy are discussed, with the goal of advancing precision clinical decision-making for LN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.