ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026
Evaluation of HPV Knowledge Levels Among Healthcare Professionals and Medical Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Private Hospitals and Foundation Universities in Turkey.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of HPV Knowledge Levels Among Healthcare Professionals and Medical Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Private Hospitals and Foundation Universities in Turkey.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the knowledge and attitudes toward human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccination among healthcare professionals and medical students and to identify demographic and professional factors associated with variations in HPV knowledge. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 903 participants comprising medical doctors, medical students, nurses, and other allied healthcare personnel. HPV knowledge was measured using the validated 33-item Human Papillomavirus Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS), which evaluates four domains: general HPV knowledge, HPV screening tests, HPV vaccination, and the national HPV vaccination program. Demographic, educational, occupational, and geographical variables were also collected. Total and domain-specific scores were compared across gender, professional groups, and educational levels. Results: The mean total HPV knowledge score was 19.23 out of 33, indicating moderate overall knowledge. Correct response rates were high for core factual items (e.g., HPV as the leading cause of cervical cancer), yet several misconceptions persisted, including misunderstandings about HIV/AIDS causation and HPV transmission dynamics. Male participants demonstrated significantly higher total knowledge ( Conclusions: HPV knowledge among healthcare professionals and medical students was moderate, with persistent misconceptions across several domains. Gender-based differences and unexpected patterns among physicians and medical students suggest that existing curricula may not adequately address HPV and HPV vaccination. Strengthening formal education, integrating evidence-based HPV modules into health sciences training, and providing structured professional development are essential to enhancing HPV awareness, supporting vaccination advocacy, and improving preventive health practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.