Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42489335›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Current Challenges of Transcription Compartmentalization Research.

Thomas Quail, Sina Wittmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas QuailEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sina WittmannInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-5331

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription is spatially organized in the nucleus, concentrating transcription factors, coactivators, and RNA polymerase II into dynamic, membraneless compartments. Such assemblies have been described in many ways, from small complexes of defined stoichiometry to membraneless biomolecular condensates. We argue that these are not competing descriptions but positions along a single continuum, and propose "transcriptional compartment" as an umbrella term for it. We then turn to the functional literature and ask what these compartments have been shown to do, and what they have not. The clearest evidence for a functional role of condensation may emerge in contexts where transcription must generate switch-like responses, such as cell-fate decisions, stress responses, environmental sensing, and disease. Much of the remaining biology, however, sits in the small, transient assemblies between the two extremes. These are the hardest to study, in part because they fall below the diffraction limit of light microscopy and because the interactions that drive their formation usually also carry out their function, so the two cannot be perturbed independently. We survey the experimental and computational toolkit available for this problem and outline the open methodological challenges that remain.

Indexed as

Cell CompartmentationCell NucleusTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticAnimalsHumansRNA Polymerase IIRNA Polymerase IITranscription Factorscondensationintrinsically disordered proteinsmacromolecular assemblymolecular biophysicsmultivalent bindingnucleusRNA polymerase IIsingle molecule imagingsuperresolutiontranscription (biology)

Identifiers

PMID42489335
PMCPMC13393281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.