ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Cardiovascular Disease in Males With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are scarce data on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in male breast cancer (BC).
objectivesThe objective of the study was to describe CVD risk in males with BC compared to females with BC and cancer-free males.
methodsPopulation-based cohort study using linked administrative databases. We identified males diagnosed with BC in Ontario, Canada (1998-2021). Male BC patients were age-matched to 3 female BC and 3 male cancer-free controls. The primary outcome was hospitalization or emergency department visits for CVD. Cause-specific mortality was a secondary outcome. Cause-specific hazards regression was used to estimate HRs associated with male BC status.
resultsWe matched 683 males with BC to 2,049 females with BC and 687 males with BC to 2,061 cancer-free males (median age 68 years [IQR: 59-77 years]). Males with BC had more prevalent pre-existing CVD and risk factors than both comparators. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, male BC was associated with a similar risk of CVD hospitalization/emergency department visits compared to female BC (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86-1.25) and cancer-free males (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.84-1.19). Male BC was not associated with higher CVD mortality but was associated with higher cancer mortality relative to both comparator groups.
conclusionsMales with BC have greater baseline cardiovascular risk than females with BC and cancer-free males but no increase in future CVD hazard after adjustment. This highlights the need for prioritizing cancer treatment in males with BC, with appropriate attention to CVD risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.