Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42489704›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

C-VBQ and CT hounsfield units for DXA-defined low bone mass screening and their associations with bone turnover markers.

Xiaoteng Feng, Xiujia Xia, Zelin Shen, Yan Gong, Zhenghao Huang, Bin Xie, Chenxing Huang, Zhuangzhuang Tan, Jiajun Cheng, Shengyao Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaoteng FengDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Xiujia XiaDepartment of Spine, Baoji City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji, 721001, Shanxi Province, China.
Zelin ShenDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Yan GongDepartment of Orthopedics, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, 215009, Jiangsu, China.
Zhenghao HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Bin XieDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Chenxing HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Zhuangzhuang TanDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Jiajun ChengDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Shengyao LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Hui RenDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China.
Xiaobing JiangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China. spinedrjxb@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Zhaojun ChengDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China. czjspine@163.com.
Binwei ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China. chenbinwei@gzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the relationships among the Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality score (C-VBQ), mean Hounsfield units on cervical CT (C-HU), the lowest T-score from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone turnover markers (BTMs). It also compared the performance of C-VBQ and C-HU in screening for DXA-defined low bone mass.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 91 patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spondylosis who had preoperative cervical MRI, CT, DXA, and BTMs. Based on the lowest DXA T-score, patients were categorized as having normal bone mass (T ≥ -1.0), osteopenia (-2.5 < T < -1.0), or osteoporosis (T ≤ -2.5). Differences in C-VBQ and BTMs across groups were analyzed. Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression assessed associations between C-VBQ, imaging parameters, and BTMs. Additional partial correlation analyses were performed after controlling for age, sex, and BMI, and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction was applied to the correlation heatmaps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the ability of C-VBQ and C-HU to identify low bone mass (T < -1.0).

resultsC-VBQ showed significant differences across DXA groups (P < 0.001), while C-HU and the lowest T-score decreased progressively with worsening bone status (P < 0.001). C-VBQ correlated negatively with C-HU (ρ = -0.523, P < 0.001) and the lowest T-score (ρ = -0.512, P < 0.001), and C-HU correlated positively with the lowest T-score (ρ = 0.613, P < 0.001); these core imaging-based associations remained significant after FDR correction. After adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, C-VBQ remained associated with C-HU (partial r = -0.421, P < 0.001) and the lowest T-score (partial r = -0.419, P < 0.001). A weak association was observed between C-VBQ and β-CTX after adjustment (partial r = 0.221, P = 0.039), but the corresponding unadjusted heatmap association did not survive FDR correction (FDR q = 0.090). Multiple linear regression identified age (P = 0.016) and β-CTX (P = 0.037) as independent correlates of C-VBQ. For screening low bone mass, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.702 for C-VBQ (optimal cutoff: 3.48; sensitivity 0.492, specificity 0.906) and 0.773 for C-HU (optimal cutoff: 324.57 HU; sensitivity 0.729, specificity 0.781).

conclusionIn patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, C-VBQ demonstrates consistent associations with C-HU and DXA T-scores, supporting its potential for opportunistic preoperative bone quality assessment. The association between C-VBQ and β-CTX was weak and exploratory. Integrating radiological indicators such as C-VBQ and C-HU with DXA and BTMs may enable a more comprehensive, but still cautiously interpreted, perioperative bone health evaluation.

Indexed as

Bone turnover markersDegenerative cervical diseaseHounsfield UnitsOsteoporosisVertebral bone quality score

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.